| 1 | #!/usr/bin/env bash
|
| 2 | #
|
| 3 | # Usage:
|
| 4 | # ./run.sh <function name>
|
| 5 |
|
| 6 | set -o nounset
|
| 7 | set -o pipefail
|
| 8 | set -o errexit
|
| 9 |
|
| 10 | DIR=benchmarks/javascript
|
| 11 |
|
| 12 | # TODO:
|
| 13 | # - Use benchmarks/time.py for this and make a table
|
| 14 | # - Upgrade quickjs
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 | run-all() {
|
| 17 | local name=$1
|
| 18 | shift
|
| 19 | set -x
|
| 20 |
|
| 21 | time $DIR/$name.py "$@"
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 | time $DIR/$name.js "$@"
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 | time ~/src/duktape-2.5.0/duk $DIR/$name.js "$@"
|
| 26 | time ~/src/languages/quickjs-2019-07-09/qjs $DIR/$name.js "$@"
|
| 27 |
|
| 28 | time bash $DIR/$name.sh "$@"
|
| 29 | time zsh $DIR/$name.sh "$@"
|
| 30 |
|
| 31 | # OSH under CPython: 21.5 seconds. 10x slower.
|
| 32 | time bin/osh $DIR/$name.sh "$@"
|
| 33 | }
|
| 34 |
|
| 35 | # integers is a lot harder for shell than hexstring
|
| 36 | # searching through 1000 * 1000 = 1M.
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 | # duktape = 89 ms
|
| 39 | # quickjs = 18 ms # beats node probably because of startup time
|
| 40 | # node = 32 ms
|
| 41 | #
|
| 42 | # zsh: 1.2 seconds. bash 2.5 seconds. So JS has a big advantage here.
|
| 43 |
|
| 44 | squares() { run-all squares; }
|
| 45 |
|
| 46 | # duktape = 123ms
|
| 47 | # quickjs = 71ms
|
| 48 | # node.js = 38ms. Not bad although that may be startup time.
|
| 49 | # this is searching through a loop of 16 * 16 * 16 = 4096.
|
| 50 | #
|
| 51 | # zsh: 150 ms, bash: 165ms. Not as big an advantage. But still JS is better
|
| 52 | # for code readability.
|
| 53 | hexstring() { run-all hexstring; }
|
| 54 |
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 | "$@"
|